PEMBATASAN KEWENANGAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI MELALUI UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR TAHUN 1945
Abstract
Powers of the Constitutional Court have been regulated in the Constitution. In the Constitution of the powers of the Constitutional Court has been clearly regulated. Then came the effort to increase the powers of the Constitutional Court through various Law and the decision of the Constitutional Court itself. The extra power of the Constitutional Court has turned out to cause various problems, including corruption. Constitution, in essence, provides power restrictions. Powers of state institutions stipulated in the Constitution means that power is limited. Extra power through the Constitutional Court Act has turned out to cause problems. Therefore, the power of the Constitutional Court must be returned to the authority contained in the Constitution alone. Thus the addition of powers of the Constitutional Court through a change in the Constitution is not necessary.
ÂÂ
Keywords : Authority, Constitution, Constitualism, Constitutional Court, Restriction.
References
Baktinendra Prawiro, (2015). 70 Tahun Indonesia Merdeka, Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
Benny K Harman, (2013). Mempertimbangkan Mahkamah Konstitusi: Sejarah Pemikiran Pengujian UU terhadap UUD, Jakarta†Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia.
Carla M. Zoethout, Ger van der Tang, Piet Akkermans (editor), (1993). Control in Constitutional Law, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Dahlan Thaib, Jazim Hamidi, Ni’matul Huda, (2004). Teori Hukum dan Konstitusi, Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Daniel S Lev, (1990). Hukum dan Politik di Indonesia, Jakarta: LP3ES.
Encyclopaedia Britannica Volume 6, Chicago: William Benton Publisher, 1960, hlm. 316.
Eric Barent, (1998). An Introduction to Constitutional Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Frans Magnis Suseno, (2001) Kuasa dan Moral, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Imam Anshori Saleh & Jazim Hamidi, (2004). Memerdekakan Indonesia Kembali, Perjalanan Bangsa dari Soekarno ke Megawati, Jogjakarta: IRCiSoD.
Jimly Asshiddiqie, (20150. Pengantar ilmu huku tata negara, Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
John Alder, (1989). Constitutional and Administrative Law, London: Macmillan Professional Master.
S.F Marbun, (2002). Peradilan Administrasi Negara dan Upaya Administratif di Indonesia, Yogyakarta: UII Press.
Soetandyo Wignjosoebroto, (2002). Hukum: Paradigma, Metode dan Dinamika Masalahnya, Jakarta: ELSAM & HUMA.
Sri Soemantri, (1992). Bunga Rampai Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia, Bandung: Alumni.
Sri Soemantri, (2014). Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia, Pemikiran dan Pandangan, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Yance Arizona, Endra Wijaya, Tanisius Sebastian, (2014). Pancasila dalam putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jakarta: Epistema Insttute.
Ayu Desiana, “Analisis Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Mengeluarkan Putusan Yang Bersifat Ultra Petita Berdasarkan Undang-Undang nomor 24 Tahun 2003â€Â, Majalah Hukum Forum Akademika, Volume 25, Nomor 1, Maret 2014, ISSN: 0854-789 X.
Bo Li, “Constitutionalism and the Rule of Lawâ€Â, Perspectives, Vol.2, No.1. http://www.oycf.org/Perspectives/7_083100/constitutionalism_and_the_rule_o.htm, [4/4/05].
Damos Dumoli Agusman, “Keputusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Tentang Piagam ASEAN: Arti Penting Bagi Perjanjian Internasional Lainnyaâ€Â, JURNAL OPINIO JURIS, Vol. 13 Mei - Agustus 2013.
Riri Nazriyah, “Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Menguji Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undangâ€Â, JURNAL HUKUM NO. 3 VOL. 17 JULI 2010, hlm. 404.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
